Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Critique - Essay ExampleIn essence, justified theft can be pull in Buddhistic customs duty, in a specified circumstance. Justified theft in Buddhist tradition is committed with the objective of countering dishonesty. For example, I go for witnessed Sakka commit a justified theft by theft a stolen memento from Brahmin Dona, which would have resulted to a dishonor of Buddhas token. Additionally, the clause depicts that, in Sri Lanka, in that location is a belief that a relic would disappear if it were non properly venerated. Essentially, the expression demonstrates that a relic has the power to consent its own theft, and this is better understood as a theft not organism a theft (Trainor, 1992 p7). 2. What did you find difficult to understand from the article? I found difficulty in understanding why conflict would arise among the eight territorial clans because they all want to own phonation of the relic. I also do not understand the reason why the clans, would not settle on establishing a single location in which the whole of the relic would have been put for to ensure easier veneration. Instead, they colonised on dividing the relics among themselves, which resulted in some individuals stealing the relic while other clans became unsatisfied. Moreover, I come hornswoggle of understanding why the followers of Buddhist tradition would resolve to violate the traditions principles just to own the relic of the traditions founder (Trainor, 1992 p12). 3. What did the reservoir do wellspring, either in her argument or in presentation? The author did well, in the article, by providing a presentation that had an introduction of how the Buddhist tradition came to have a human activity of venerated relics. He also depicted how the concept of theft not a theft is established by providing various examples in Buddhist tradition and texts. Furthermore, his arguments are based on authoritative scriptural warrants, and thus, his article has arguments that are factua l in nature. The presentation is chronological in the sense that it entails events that preceded the immediate death of Buddha. The article also enjoys a deep understanding of the Buddhist tradition and relics. Evidently, the author satisfactorily discussed how, in Buddhist tradition, a theft that is not a theft is committed. He shows this by discussing that a relic is stringy in that it can only be stolen from a place where it is not properly venerated. Lastly, the author did well by pointing out problematic areas in Buddhist tradition firstly, the act of stealing is forbidden in Buddhist tradition, but acts of stealing relics exist. Secondly, the act of being attached to a relic is against the Buddhist teaching method of being attached to objects, which can be put under human possession and manipulation (Trainor, 1992 p20). 4. What do you think the author could have done better? The author could have done better by giving the discussion on relics a different approach apart from the concept of theft not a theft. The concept could have entailed something like honoring a dishonored cause. This would decimate the negativity that has been associated with a tradition whose founder had attained a high degree of enlightenment. Additionally, the author would have justified the above premise by providing scriptural warrants from Buddhist tradition and text. This would have resulted in a positive depiction of Buddhist tradition and the idea of veneration (Trainor, 1992 p3). 5. What personal reflections came to mind while information the